FRC Judges nominated by the National Lead Judge under FPR 2010 30.3(5C)
Appeals.NominatedJudgesappeals.nominatedjudges.xlsx11 KBdownload-circle
Latest
FRC Judges nominated by the National Lead Judge under FPR 2010 30.3(5C)
Appeals.NominatedJudgesappeals.nominatedjudges.xlsx11 KBdownload-circle
KA v LE [2023] EWFC 266 (B)
Judgment date: 29 November 2023
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2023/266
DDJ Mark Harrop. Final hearing in FR proceedings with consideration of relevance to findings in children proceedings that H had bullied, coerced and controlled W throughout the whole of their marriage.
The first issue was whether
What Is the True Extent of FDR Privilege?
In L v O (Stay of Order; Hadkinson Order; Security for Costs) [2024] EWFC 6 (26 January 2024) Cobb J considered whether a judge hearing a Barder (or Thwaite) application can/should be made aware of what took place at the FDR appointment where the original order was agreed and
What Is the True Extent of FDR Privilege?
In L v O (Stay of Order; Hadkinson Order; Security for Costs) [2024] EWFC 6 (26 January 2024) Cobb J considered whether a judge hearing a Barder (or Thwaite) application can/should be made aware of what took place at the FDR appointment where the original order was agreed and
Collardeau v Fuchs & Harrison [2024] EWHC 256 (Fam)
Judgment date: 08 February 2024
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2024/256
Knowles J. Refusal of W’s application for permission to bring contempt proceedings against H and another.
Background
H applied to prevent Sears Tooth from representing W. H claimed both he and William Harrison (WH) had
Guideline Hourly Rates on Costs: Addendum
In KS v VS (Judgment – Summary Assessment of Costs – Civil Guide) [2024] EWHC 278 (Fam) (12 February 2024), Arbuthnot J referred to H v GH [2023] EWFC 235, [2024] Costs LR 27 and the question raised by DHCJ Simon Colton KC as to the relevance or otherwise of the guideline